The appellant appeal against the acquittal of respondents in a case involving escape of an under-trial prisoner from their custody was dismissed as devoid of merit since no evidence showed respondents were in complicity with the escaped accused.
Appeal dismissed. Judgment and order of acquittal affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- GOVERNMENT APPEAL No. - 2183 of 2004
Appellant :- State of U.P. Respondent :- C/P.2743 Dharam Singh And Another. Counsel for Appellant :- U.C.Verma Counsel for Respondent :- Anil Kumar Tripathi,Lalit Kishore Pandey
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
Digitally signed by CHEBROLU Order Date :- 28.7.2022/Rao/SRINIVASA RAO Date: 2022.07.28 18:58:43 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court erred in law in acquitting the respondents for escape of prison错过的 accused.
State of U.P.
C/P.2743 Dharam Singh
Another
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
