The court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A IPC and Dowry prohibition Act, ruling that continuation of trials was unjustified as the parties had amicably settled the dispute through a verified written compromise.
Charge-sheet, summoning order, and all proceedings of Case No. 77638 of 2019 were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3253 of 2022
Applicant :- Neelam
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Avinash Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sartaj Ali Ansari
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh,J.
and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466.
Order Date :- 28.7.2022 Rao/-
Digitally signed by CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Date: 2022.07.28 18:53:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 498A IPC and Dowry prohibition Act can be quashed when parties have set aside the dispute via compromise.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
B.S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and anotherApplied¶9
(2003) 4 SCC 675 · Who else cites this
Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and anotherApplied¶9
(2008) 9 SCC 677 · Who else cites this
Manoj Sharma versus State and othersApplied¶9
(2008) 16 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
Gian Singh Versus State of PunjabApplied¶9
(2010) 15 SCC 118 · Who else cites this
Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and anotherApplied¶9
(2014) 6 SCC 466 · Who else cites this
Neelam
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
