The petitioner requested liberty to file a fresh petition after declining to press the present PIL. The court dismissed the instant petition as not pressed, granting the requested liberty.
Liberty granted to file a fresh petition; present petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 784 of 2022
Petitioner :- Krishna Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saryu Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4 and learned counsel for respondent no.5 are present.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he does not want to press the present petition and requested that liberty may be given to him to file a fresh.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 16.11.2022 Anil K. Sharma
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2022.11.17 10:35:16 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Krishna Kumar Tiwari
State Of U.P.
Mohd. Aslam
Anil K. Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
