This Court dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition was not pressed. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7709 of 2022
Petitioner :- Sareefun Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Daya Shankar Yadav,Sanjiv Kumar Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gopal Krishna Pathak, learned A.C.S.C. and Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.6.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits before this Court that he does not want to press the instant writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy at appropriate stage before concerned authority.
Order Date :- 3.11.2022 Jyotsana
Digitally signed by JYOTSANA SINGH Date: 2022.11.03 16:57:56 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sareefun
State Of U.P.
Mohd. Aslam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
