Disposed

Deshraj Kannaujiya Thru His Father Ram Sanehi v. State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt Civil Sectt and Others

Allahabad HC22 Feb 2022/701/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court considered an application for modifying bail conditions in six criminal cases, allowing the applicant to furnish one personal bond of Rs.1 lac and two sureties of the like amount to substitute 12 sureties due to financial hardship.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the applicant to furnish one personal bond of Rs.1 lac and two sureties of the like amount in lieu of twelve sureties across six cases.

Deshraj Kannaujiya Thru His Father Ram Sanehi Vs… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 13

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 701 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Deshraj Kannaujiya Thru His Father Ram Sanehi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt Civil Sectt And Others

¶4

Counsel for Applicant :- Bhimbahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.

¶6

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been released on bail in following cases:-

¶8

(i) Case crime No. 356 of 2021 under sections 411, 413, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow

¶9

(ii) Case crime No. 355 of 2021 under sections 379, 411, 413 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow

¶10

(iii)Case crime No. 351 of 2021 under sections 411, 413, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow

¶11

(iv) Case crime No. 350 of 2021 under sections 411, 413, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow

¶12

(v) Case crime No. 334 of 2021 under sections 411, 413, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Chinhat, Lucknow

¶13

(vi) Case crime No. 484 of 2020 under section 379 I.P.C., P.S. Vibhuti Khand, Lucknow.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that due to poor financial condition, the applicant is not in a position to manage 12 sureties in all six cases.

¶15

As such, he seeks the benefit of judgment passed by Hon'be Supreme Court of India in "Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of U.P." passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl) No. 8914-8915 of 2018.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid, it is provided that the applicant may furnish a personal bond of Rs.1 lac and two sureties each of the like amount which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases above mentioned in which the bail orders have been passed.

¶17

With these observations this application under Section 482

¶18

Cr.P.c. is disposed of.

¶19

Order Date :- 22.2.2022 kkb/

¶20

Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL Date: 2022.02.22 14:58:07 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Deshraj Kannaujiya Thru His Father Ram Sanehi v. State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt Civil Sectt and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deshraj Kannaujiya Thru His Father Ram Sanehi v. State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home Deptt Govt Civil Sectt and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Yadav and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy Home Deptt and Another

Dilip Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin Secy Home and Another

Ashok Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home. Lko and Others

Shah Alam and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another

Awadesh Pal and Others Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home and Another

Jishan Ahmed Siddiqui @ Shekhu Vs State of U.P. through a.C.S./Principal Secretary, Department of Home and Anr.