In Criminal Appeal No. 407 of 2016, the Single Judge Bench allowed the appeal by direct reference to a separate order passed in Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2016 without recording distinct reasoning. (ok
The appeal was allowed by reference to the order in Criminal Appeal No. 435 of 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW)
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 407 of 2016 Appellant :- Arvind Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Mr. Amit Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- Additional Govt. Advocate, Mr. Umesh Chand Verma
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Saroj Yadav,J.
The appeal is allowed. For order, see order passed in Criminal Appeal No.435 of 2016 (Deepak Kumar Yadav vs. State of U.P.).
(Mrs. Saroj Yadav, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 06.09.2022 S. Shivhare
Digitally signed by SHASHANK SHIVHARE Date: 2022.09.06 17:35:21 IST
Arvind Kumar Maurya
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Saroj Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
