Disposed

Mrs. Savita Singh Thru. His Power of Allorney Holder/ Husband Mrityunjay Kymar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Urban Planning , Civil Secrt. Lko. and Ors.

Allahabad HC25 May 2022/3098/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the court directed the District Magistrate to execute a recovery certificate issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. The court also directed the respondent to act under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act regarding a specific application.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Magistrate to execute recovery certificate within four months; direction to Respondent No.2 to decide Section 63 application.

Mrs. Savita Singh Thru. His Power of Allorney… — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2022)

¶1

Court No. - 2

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3098 of 2022

¶3

Petitioner :- Mrs. Savita Singh Thru. His Power Of Allorney Holder/ Husband Mrityunjay Kymar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning , Civil Secrt. Lko. And Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Mandeep Singh,Adarsh Pratap Singh,Mohit Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shobhit Mohan Shukla

¶4

Hon'ble Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State counsel and Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

¶6

By means of this petition, prayer has been made to issue appropriate direction to the District Magistrate concerned for executing the recovery certificate dated 20.04.2021 issued by the Secretary, Real Estate Regulatory Authority for realizing the amount in terms of the judgment and order dated 06.11.2020 passed by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. Further prayer is to issue a direction to respondent No.2 to complete the proceeding against respondent No.5 in terms of Section 63 of Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act, 2016.

¶7

In paragraph-7 of the writ petition, it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that no appeal against the order dated 06.11.2020 has been preferred.

¶8

Accordingly, having regard to the aforesaid facts, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to District Magistrate concerned to execute the recovery certificate dated 20.04.2021 and recover the amount thereof expeditiously as far as possible within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, if there is no legal impediment.

¶9

Respondent No.2 is also directed to proceed with the application said to have been preferred by the petitioner under Section 63 of Real Estate (Regulation & Development Act, 2016 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible after due notice etc. to respondent No.5.

¶10

Order Date :- 25.5.2022 Jaswant

¶11

Digitally signed by JASWANT KUMAR Date: 2022.05.25 16:27:58 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Mrs. Savita Singh Thru. His Power of Allorney Holder/ Husband Mrityunjay Kymar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Urban Planning , Civil Secrt. Lko. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Savita Singh Thru. His Power of Allorney Holder/ Husband Mrityunjay Kymar Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Urban Planning , Civil Secrt. Lko. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Snehlata Verma Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Housing and Urban Planning Civil Sect. Lko and 6 Other

Mohammad Raees and Another Vs State of U.P. Thru.Secy.Ministry of Local Bodies and 4 Other

Munshilal Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue Lko. and Others

Tarun Sahkari Awas Samiti Lko. Thru.Secy. Bhola Nath Shukla Vs District Magistrate and Others

Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Urban Planning Govt. of U.P. Lko. and Others

M.D. Karnadhar Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Housing and Urban Planning, Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others