Daya Shankar v. Prin. Judge Family Court Lakhimpur Kheri
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 245 of 2016…
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 245 of 2016…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 245 of 2016
Revisionist :- Daya Shankar Opposite Party :- Prin. Judge Family Court Lakhimpur Kheri Counsel for Revisionist :- Ram Bux Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
None present for revisionist. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Perusal of record shows that learned counsel for revisionist has not taken steps as such notice to opposite party nos.2 & 3 could not be issued.
In such circumstances, it appears that the revisionist is not interested in pursuing the present revision. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 18.11.2022 Anil K. Sharma
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Date: 2022.11.19 10:47:37 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Daya Shankar
Prin. Judge Family Court Lakhimpur Kheri
Mohd. Aslam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court