An applicant filed a contempt application regarding a writ order. The court dismissed the application as infructuous because the respondents had filed a vakalatnama and an affidavit of compliance, demonstrating that the underlying order had already been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2349 of 2022
Applicant :- Jai Shankar Pandey Opposite Party :- Sri Ranveer Prasad, Housing Commissioner, U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Dubey
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Case called out. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press the application.
Vakalatnama filed by Shri Umesh Chandra Pandey, Advocate on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2 are taken on record. He also files afÏdavit of compliance duly signed by respondent no. 2, which is also taken on record.
Shri Umesh Chandra Pandey submits that the order of the writ Court has already been complied with. It is, thus, submitted that the application has lost its efÏcacy and may be dismissed.
Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents and going through the contents of the afÏdavit of compliance, the application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 9.12.2022 VKS
Digitally signed by VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Date: 2022.12.12 17:42:29 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jai Shankar Pandey
Sri Ranveer Prasad
Rajeev Singh
Vivek Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
