Contempt application dismissed as infructuous because the applicant admitted compliance with the Writ Court’s order, rendering the application ineffective.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 993 of 2022
Applicant :- Shitla Prasad Singh And Others Opposite Party :- Renuka Kumar, Prin. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinay Kumar Mishra,Anil Kumar Upadhyay,Laxmi Narayan Gupta,Ram Bali Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute this fact that order of the Writ Court is complied with, therefore, the present contempt application lost its efficacy.
Accordingly, in terms of submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.12.2022 Gaurav/-
Digitally signed by GAURAV PAL Date: 2022.12.08 18:06:41 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Shitla Prasad Singh And Others
Rajeev Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
