Sangam Lal v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Single paragraph order adjourning coercive action against a petitioner for non-deposit of road tax pending the issuance of a vehicle accident recovery certificate.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 560 of 2020 Petitioner :- Sangam Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Tripathi,Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
Heard Sri Rajnessh Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner for the following relief:-
"(a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the recovery certificate dated 13.09.2019 issued by the respondents against the petitioner (Annexure No.2) to this writ petition.
(b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents and directing them not to issue any coercive measure against the petitioner regarding the recovery of amount."
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased a Motor Van No.UP70-CT-9860 in the year 2015 and the same was registered with the Regional Transport Officer, Allahabad on 19.10.2015, wherein it has been stated that the owner of the vehicle/petitioner should deposit Rs.3960/quarterly towards road tax. Unfortunately, an accident took place with the vehicle of the petitioner on 22.12.2015 and it is lying in the garage since 22.12.2015 on account of which the petitioner could not deposit the amount of road tax. Consequently, the respondent no.3/Assistant Regional Transport Officer (Administration), Prayagraj has issued the impugned recovery certificate on 13.9.2019 against the petitioner. He very fairly submits that due to huge financial crisis, the petitioner was unable to deposit Rs.1,12,662/- in response to the recovery certificate and in case some reasonable time is accorded by this Court, then definitely the petitioner would deposit the entire outstanding amount.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted time to deposit the outstanding road tax and thereby avoid coercive measures.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sangam Lal
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WTAX/560/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court