The court disposed of a writ petition challenging actions of a private bank, noting the petitioner failed to state loan repayment details.
The writ petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9876 of 2021
Petitioner :- Umesh Chand Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Subedar Mishra,Pushpa Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
In none of the paragraphs of the writ petition, the petitioner has stated as to when default has been committed in repayment of loan.
Even otherwise, the writ petition is directed against the private bank. It is open for the petitioner to approach the appropriate Court/forum for redressal of his grievances.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
Order Date :- 22.3.2021 Harshita
Umesh Chand
State of U.P.
Another
Sunita Agarwal
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
