Ambedkar Rao and 9 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition but expressed a desire to withdraw the proceedings. The court dismissed the petition based on this request.
The petitioner filed a writ petition but expressed a desire to withdraw the proceedings. The court dismissed the petition based on this request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9065 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ambedkar Rao And 9 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh,Awadhesh Kumar Singh,Ram Manohar Kashyap Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Shri Ram Manohar Kashyap, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not wish to prosecute the writ petition. The writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 5.10.2021 Dhananjai
Ambedkar Rao And 9 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court