Disposed

Shiv Mohan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 Aug 2021WRIC/9045/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of a writ petition challenging a recovery notice. The court stayed recovery proceedings contingent on a partial deposit of Rs. 50,000 by September 6, 2021, followed by quarterly installments of the balance within six months, provided the petitioner complies.

What did the court decide?

Stay of recovery proceedings contingent on deposit of Rs. 50,000 followed by six quarterly installments of the balance.

Shiv Mohan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Execution and Attachment | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 2

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9045 of 2021

¶3

Petitioner :- Shiv Mohan Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.

¶5

The petition is directed against the impugned notice dated 11.01.2021 issued by the second respondent, for recovery of Rs. 3,36,000/-.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is ready to deposit the entire amount in six quarterly installment and in the meantime, recovery may be stayed.

¶7

In view of the aforesaid statement, the petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) on or before 6 September 2021.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with the following direction:-

¶9

The recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance, provided the petitioner deposits Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) on or before 6 September 2021.

¶10

On deposit of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) on or before 6 September 2021, the respondent-bank would furnish the complete statement of accounts showing all the deposits which have been made by the petitioner till date and the balance amount payable with interest.

¶11

Rest of the amount shall be deposited by the petitioner in six equal quarterly installments, commencing from 15 October 2021.

¶12

Any amount already deposited shall be adjusted.

¶13

The petitioner shall make deposit of the last installment along with upto date interest.

¶14

In the event of default in complying with any of the aforementioned conditions, it would be open for the respondents to recover the amount forthwith, in accordance with law.

¶15

As only the citation has yet been issued and recovery has not been proceeded with, therefore, in case, the petitioner makes deposit as per the above schedule, no recovery charges shall be realized from him.

¶16

With the aforesaid direction, the petition is disposed of.

¶17

Order Date :- 5.8.2021 S.Prakash

Shiv Mohan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Mohan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madan Singh and 9 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Thaan Singh and 11 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dharampal Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Satyawan Singh Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Sumaira Bano Vs State of U P and 2 Others

Mukesh Sharma Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others