Petitioner sought a writ restraining respondents from compelling a royalty deposit for District Mineral Foundation in mining area, but withdrew the petition as no demand notice was issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8960 of 2021
Petitioner :- Shailendra Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sanjay Yadav,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioner, by way of present petition, seeks following relief:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and restraining the respondents, especially respondent no.2 and 3 from compelling the petitioner to deposit 10% of the regular installments of royalty towards the amount of District Mineral Foundation (DMF) in respect of sand/morrum mining area of Khand No.31/4 area 36.437 hectares, situated in village Patyora Tehsil and District Hamirpur"
It is fairly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not presently subjected to a demand notice, therefore, prays for withdrawal of this petition.
Prayer allowed.
Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Needles to say, in case of accrual of fresh cause of action, petitioner is always at liberty to seek redressal before the court of law.
Order Date :- 18.3.2021 SK
(Jayant Banerji, J.) (Sanjay Yadav, J.)
Shailendra Yadav
State Of U.P.
Others
Sanjay Yadav
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
