Sri Gautam v. State of U P and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it did not survive, since the petitioner had already received the money in dispute.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as it did not survive, since the petitioner had already received the money in dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 8646 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sri Gautam Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjeet Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Ranjeet Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the cause on which the writ petition was founded does not survive. The petitioner has received the money.
In such view of the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 18.11.2021 Ashish Tripathi
Sri Gautam
State Of U P
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court