Writ petition filed by U.P.S.R.T.C. was dismissed by a single judge due to non-prosecution, as the petitioner failed to appear before the court on the date fixed for hearing during the revised call.
None; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 40790 of 2001
Petitioner :- U.P.S.R.T.C.Thru Its R.M. Jhansi Respondent :- B.L. Verma And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Anand Gaur,Nishant Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Tripathi
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. The names of the learned counsel for the petitioner are shown in the cause list.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.11.2021 Ashish Tripathi
U.P.S.R.T.C., Thru Its R.M. Jhansi
B.L. Verma
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
