The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying mutation proceedings had been decided by the competent authority, causing the cause of action to expire.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5099 of 2021
Petitioner :- Saurabh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that the pending mutation proceedings has been decided by the competent authority on 9 August 2021. Copy of the order has been made available to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
It appears that the cause no longer survives.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 18.8.2021 S.Prakash
Saurabh Kumar Yadav
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
