Vibhav Nath and 7 Others v. State of U P and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the counsel's statement that the underlying matter had become moot.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous based on the counsel's statement that the underlying matter had become moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5093 of 2021
Petitioner :- Vibhav Nath And 7 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Pandey,Ram Krishna Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of statement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.8.2021 V.S.Singh
Vibhav Nath And 7 Others
State Of U P And 7 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court