The petitioner did not press the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Additional Cause List Serial No. 30 connected
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 451 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Prathana Jaiswal and others Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Shakti Swarup Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. A.K. Goyal, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4, Sri Pranjal Mehrotra for respondent no. 5
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitionerd submitted that he does not want to press the present petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Date :- 3.12.2021 Rahul Dwivedi/Amit Mishra
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Smt. Prathana Jaiswal and others
State of U.P. and others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
