Shyam Bahadur v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, allowing the petitioner to apply for recall if any cause of action survives.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time, allowing the petitioner to apply for recall if any cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 43465 of 2007
Petitioner :- Shyam Bahadur Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Saran Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ajay Srivastava
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
From perusal of record, it transpires that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
In view of above, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, however, leaving it open to the petitioner that in case any cause of action survives, he may move an application for recalling the said order.
Order Date :- 9.11.2021 SK Goswami
Shyam Bahadur
State of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court