Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 26083 of 2012
Petitioner :- Vineet Maheshwari Respondent :- Chairperson Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- R.P. Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :- Ashok Mehta,J.Banerji,Sandeep Arora,Satish Chaturvedi,Vipin Sinha
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
No one is present on behalf of petitioners to press the petition.
Sri Satish Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for the bank, is present.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, granted earlier, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.11.2021 Shekhar
Vineet Maheshwari
Chairperson Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
