The High Court of Uttar Pradesh (Court No. - 18) dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution in an ex parte hearing where the petitioner's counsel did not appear to press the case. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3765 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sukhpal Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Krishnaji Khare,Mrityunjay Khare Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rajesh Yadav,Rakesh Singh
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. Name of counsel for the petitioner is shown in the cause list.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Sri Rakesh Singh, learned counsel for respondent is present.
Order Date :- 22.9.2021 Nadeem
Sukhpal Singh
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
