Brief order where the Hon'ble judge dismissed a petition challenging the evaluation of a biology theory answer sheet. The court noted that scrutiny application results were confirmed unaltered and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition dismissed as scrutiny application result was confirmed unaltered with original marks affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2711 of 2021
Petitioner :- Priti (Minor) Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Sunder Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned Standing counsel on the basis of instructions submits that scrutiny application of the petitioner for scrutiny of the biology theory answer sheet has been processed. The result remains unaltered even after scrutiny and the marks awarded by earlier examiner stand affirmed.
In view of the said submissions writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 5.7.2021 Nadeem Ahmad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to further marks or a review of the biology theory answer sheet evaluation.
Priti (Minor)
State of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
