The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking expeditious disposal of a firearm license application, relying on a specific prior judgment and ordering the Licensing Authority to act accordingly.
Order dated 30.3.2016 in W.P. 13821 of 2016 applied; Case disposed accordingly. Licensing Authority directed to act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28686 of 2021
Petitioner :- Himanshu Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the State-respondents.
The relief claimed in this writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the application for grant of firearm license.
In view of judgment and order dated 30.3.2016 passed in Writ Petition No.13821 of 2016 (Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and others) , there is no need for any separate and further order and the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms and conditions.
The Licensing Authority/District Magistrate shall act accordingly.
Order Date :- 2.11.2021 V.S.Singh
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and othersReferred¶7
Writ Petition No.13821 of 2016 (Masood Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and others)
Himanshu Pandey
State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
V.S. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
