The High Court disposed of the writ petition noting the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22971 of 2021
Petitioner :- Gopi Ram Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not disputes the submission of learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of taking out appropriate proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for eviction of the alleged encroachers upon public land as well as his land.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the relief sought in this writ petition. He recast his relief and submits that the petitioner may be permitted to take out proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
It is always open to the petitioner to avail legal remedies.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sri Krishna Kant, learned counsel for gaon sabha is present.
Order Date :- 21.9.2021 Nadeem
Gopi Ram
State of UP
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
