A one-line order where the High Court instructed the aggrieved party to file an appeal under Rule 59 of the U.P. Revenue Rules, stating an appropriate remedy exists.
Instructions kept on record; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22508 of 2020
Petitioner :- Jahendra Sahani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vatsala Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Instructions filed today be kept on record.
Instructions reveal that a lease has been executed in favour of the respondent no. 4.
If the petitioner is aggrieved by the execution of the lease then he may file an Appeal under Rule 59 of the U.P. Revenue Rules, 2016.
With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.2.2021 PK
Jahendra Sahani
State Of U.P.
Other Respondent 1
Other Respondent 2
Other Respondent 3
Siddhartha Varma
J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
