A single judge in a writ petition held that since the petitioner sought no construction of the Panchayat Bhawan, no interference was warranted. The court directed respondents not to divert the land use pending cancellation of the lease and disposed of the petition.
Till lease is cancelled, respondents shall not divert the use of the land.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22215 of 2020
Petitioner :- Varish Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Instructions as have been received by the learned Standing Counsel were filed today. It may be kept on record.
A perusal of Instructions reveal that no construction of the Panchayat Bhawan was being made.
Under such circumstances, no interference is warranted.
Respondents, till such time they cancel the lease of the petitioner, shall not divert the use of the land.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.1.2021 Siddhant
Varish Ali
State Of U.P.
Other 1
Other 2
Other 3
Other 4
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
