The single judge dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, holding that the petitioner was not a party to the proceedings which gave rise to the order in question and that the proper remedy lay under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21312 of 2021
Petitioner :- Babu Ram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
liable to be dismissed.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 YK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the petitioner is not a party to the proceedings in which the impugned order was passed.
Whether remedies under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are available instead of a writ petition in cases of non-compliance with revenue orders.
Babu Ram
State Of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
