The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Tehsildar to decide a pending mutation case under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act 2006 within three months to ensure swift disposal of revenue matters.
Ordered Respondent-2 to decide Case No.1735 of 2019 under Section 34 U.P. Land Revenue Act 2006 preferably within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20247 of 2021
Petitioner :- Akabari Bano Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Yadav,Ankit Kumar Sahu
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Rules cannot be said to be justified, in any manner. Furthermore, delay in disposal of above noted mutation case is not attributed to petitioner. Consequently, mandamus as prayed for is liable to be issued.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 YK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the Tehsildar to decide a mutation case under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act 2006 within a specified time limit.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Akabari Bano
State Of U.P.
Tehsildar Tehsil-Handia
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
