The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel, who stated they were pursuing alternative legal remedies instead of pressing the writ.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15368 of 2021
Petitioner :- Shamla And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhagwan Dutt Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 28.07.2021, learned Standing Counsel has placed before the Court the Register of Tehsil Machlisahar, District Jaunpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he does not want to press the writ petition and wants to withdraw the same to pursue the remedy as available under the law.
In view of the statement, so made, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate forum as provided under the law.
Order Date :- 10.8.2021 Shekhar
Shamla And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
