The High Court dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, noting that the petitioner's counsel stated the cause no longer survives at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1155 of 2021
Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Rastogi Respondent :- The Meerut Development Authority And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Priyanka Sharma,Avnish Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rohan Gupta
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause for filing of the writ petition no more survives at this stage.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
This order has been with due assistance of Sri Rohan Gupta, learned counsel for the contesting-respondent.
Order Date :- 25.1.2021 A.K.Srivastava
Digitally signed by Justice Mahesh Digitally signed by Justice Sanjay Chandra Tripathi Kumar Pachori Date: 2021.01.25 17:13:51 IST Date: 2021.01.25 17:15:23 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Smt. Poonam Rastogi
The Meerut Development Authority
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
