The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by M/S Resistoflex Dynamics Pvt. Ltd. and another for non-prosecution, as no representative appeared to advance the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10419 of 2011 Petitioner :- M/S Resistoflex Dynamics Pvt. Ltd. And Another Respondent :- Authority Under Section 6-H1 Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Miss Bushra Maryam,V.N. Mishra
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press the writ petition. The name of the counsel for the petitioner is shown in the cause list.
The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 11.11.2021 Pravin
M/S Resistoflex Dynamics Pvt. Ltd. And Another
Authority Under Section 6-H1 Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
