Ravindra Nath Yadav v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner alleged sexual harassment by a female colleague and challenged the constitution of the Internal Complaint Committee as violative of the 2013 Act. The High Court kept all issues, including the constitutional challenge, open for adjudication by the appropriate authority and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was disposed of with the issue regarding the constitution of the Internal Complaint Committee kept open for adjudication by the appropriate authority.