The writ petition seeking relief regarding ITBP services was dismissed as not maintainable, as the appropriate remedy is to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Petition dismissed for lack of maintainability as the appropriate forum is the Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 831 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sanjeev Kumar Sharma Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Swaroop Gautam Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Sri Yadvendra Pratap learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent.
A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondent regarding maintainability of the writ petition. The issue raised herein is with regard to the services rendered by the petitioner in Indo Tibetan Border Police Force (ITBP). The appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed on the above ground.
Order Date :- 18.2.2021 Himanshu
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
Union Of India
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
