A single judge allowed the writ petition based on a judgment and order passed in Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh). The impugned order and consequential order relating to the petitioner are set aside.
The impugned order as well as consequential order so far as it relates to the petitioner are set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 600 of 2021
Petitioner :- Samapika Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhananjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order passed today in Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others) .
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in judgment and order of date in Kishan Pal Singh (supra), the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order, as well as, consequential order, so far as it relates to the petitioner, are set aside.
Order Date :- 1.10.2021 S.Prakash
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and othersFollowed¶6
Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others)
Samapika Pathak
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
