The Hon'ble Single Judge allowed the writ petition on the grounds that the controversy was covered by Kishan Pal Singh (Writ-A No.7588 of 2020), attempting to quote the issue name above as the judgment name.
Writ petition allowed; impugned order relating to the petitioner set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 569 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ram Kishor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhananjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order passed today in Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others) .
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in judgment and order of date in Kishan Pal Singh (supra), the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order, so far as it relates to the petitioner, is set aside.
Order Date :- 1.10.2021 S.Prakash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is covered by the judgment in Writ-A No.7588 of 2020.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and othersRelied on¶6
Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others)
Ram Kishor
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
