In Writ-A No. 485 of 2021, the single-judge bench allowed the petition, setting aside the impugned order for the petitioner based on the reasoning in Writ-A No. 7588 of 2020.
The impugned order, so far as it relates to the petitioner, is set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 485 of 2021
Petitioner :- Chand Mohd. Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dhananjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsels for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order passed today in Writ-A No.7588 of 2020 (Kishan Pal Singh vs. State of U.P. and others) .
Accordingly, for the reasons stated in judgment and order of date in Kishan Pal Singh (supra), the writ petition is allowed. The impugned order, so far as it relates to the petitioner, is set aside.
Order Date :- 1.10.2021 S.Prakash
Chand Mohd. Khan
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
