Writ petition filed by an Assistant Teacher. The court observed that the relief sought had been satisfied by granting appointment, rendering the cause of action subsided. The writ petition was disposed of based on this submission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 495 of 2021
Petitioner :- Km. Savita Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Seemant Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 contends that the petitioner has been granted appointment as Assistant Teacher. The relief sought in the instant writ petition has been satisfied. The cause of action does not survive.
The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the submission made by Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the respondent No.3.
Order Date :- 19.2.2021 Ashish Tripathi
Km. Savita
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
