This court dismissed a writ petition (Writ - A No. - 10835 of 2020) filed by Jaydrath against the State of UP and others as infructuous due to the passage of time.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10835 of 2020
Petitioner :- Jaydrath Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Ram Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Sri Shri Ram Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, states that the present writ petition has become infrucutous with the influx of time.
Learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent is present.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 9.2.2021 P Kesari
Jaydrath
State Of U P
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
