Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal held that the second appeal before Court No. - 4 was dismissed due to the appellant's absence and failure to address the matter.
The appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1431 of 2014
Appellant :- Shashiklala Respondent :- Raj Kumar And 2 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Varun Mishra,K.K. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- P.K. Dubey,D.P. Singh,S. Niranjan
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
No one is present on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal.
Sri D.P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Sri S. Niranjan, learned counsel for the respondents, is present.
Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.11.2021 Shekhar
Shashiklala
Raj Kumar
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
