Habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous due to subsequent events. The matter was disposed of without substantive adjudication on the rights of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 219 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Ruksar Parveen And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
At the outset, Sri Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present writ petition has become infructuous on account of subsequent events.
The habeas corpus writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 6.9.2021 Brijesh
Smt. Ruksar Parveen
Another
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
