The court heard a PIL regarding the expeditious conclusion of an investigation. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedies. The prayer was granted and the petition dismissed accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Fresh List Serial No.38
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- CRIMINAL WRIT-PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. - 12 of 2021
Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pathak and others Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate
Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Syed Ali Murtaza, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 6
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal, Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J.
The prayer made in the present petition is for expeditious conclusion of the investigation in Case Crime No. 10 of 2020, under Sections 408, 409, 420, 423 and 120-B IPC, Police Station - Special Investigating Team (S.I.T.), District Lucknow.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail of the effective alternative remedy for redressal of the grievance raised in the present petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Date :- 2.12.2021 AHA/Rakesh
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Ashok Kumar Pathak and others
State of U.P. and others
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
