In Criminal Revision No. 309/2018, the Allahabad High Court (Court No. 85) summarily dismissed a revision petition challenging an order, declining substantive adjudication and reserving the question if any impropriety exists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 309 of 2018
Revisionist :- Mahipal Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
lwph iqujhf{krA
mHk; i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA foi{kh la0 1 dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
lwph iqujhf{kr djk;s tkus ij Hkh bl okn esa fdlh ds mifLFkr u gksus ds dkj.k ;g fuxjkuh vne iSjoh esa fujLr dh tkrh gSA
bl okn esa ;fn dksbZ vUrfje vkns’k gks rks mls fujLr ekuk tk;A
;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn Hkfo"; esa bl okn dks iquLFkkZfir djus gsrq dksbZ vkosnu i= fn;k tkrk gS rks mls bl U;k;ihB ls lac) u ekurs gq, mi;qDr U;k;ihB ds le{k lwphc) fd;k tk,xk D;ksafd bl okn dks xq.k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij ugha fujLr fd;k x;k gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k ls lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks rRdky voxr
djk;k tk;A
fn0 % 28&07&2021 ds0lh0flag
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the request for restoration of duty is entertainable by this Court in the absence of substantive decision on the facts.
Mahipal Singh And Another
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
