Allowed

Lokesh Dhodi v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC27 Jul 2021CRLR/783/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court quashed the Criminal Revision, holding that the revisionist's contention regarding offences against its employees and the consequent loss of protection under Section 3 of the Special Powers Act was valid. The court returned the matter to the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Quashed the Criminal Revision order dated 31-1-2018 and returned the case to the High Court for disposal according to law.

Lokesh Dhodi Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 783 of 2018

¶3

Revisionist :- Lokesh Dhodi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ghazala Bano Quadri Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

lwph iqujhf{krA

¶6

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA foi{kh la0 2 dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

¶7

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh fuxjkuh] eq0v0la0 706 lu 2015] vUrxZr /kkjk 376] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3(2)(5) ,l0lh0@,l0Vhk0 ,sDV ,oa /kkjk 66 vkbZ0Vh0 ,sDV] Fkkuk eksnh uxj] ftyk xkft;kckn ds vk/kkj ij nk;j ,l0,l0Vh0 ua0 60 lu 2016] LVsV olsZl yksds’k dqekj <ksMh esa fo’ks"k U;k;k/kh’k] (,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV) @ vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 31&1&2018] ftlds }kjk fuxjkuhdrkZ dk mUekspu izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) ;ksftr fd;k x;k gSA

¶8

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fuxjkuhdrkZx.k funksZ"k gSa] mlus uxjikfydk ifj"kn ds ps;jeSu ds fy, viuh rS;kjh fd;k] ftlls mlds fojks/kh jktuSfrd }s"ko’k mls jaft’ku bl vijk/k esa vfHk;qDr cuk fn,] rFkk mijksDr fo’ks"k l= ijh{k.k esa mldh vksj ls voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky fd;k x;k] ftls fujLr djus esa fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk =qfV dh x;h gS] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k dks vikLr dj fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us bldk ?kksj izfrjks/k fd;kA

¶10

eSaus fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ,oa iz’uxr fu.kZ;a dk

¶11

ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶12

fo}ku vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] xkft;kckn }kjk vfHk;qDr ds mUekspu izkFkZuki= ds fo:) ihfM+rk dh vkifRr;ksa dk ifj’khyu djus rFkk mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks lquus ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk ifj’khyu djus] ,oa izdj.k ij leqfpr fopkjksijkUr vfHk;qDr dks ekeys esa mUeksfpr fd, tkus ds fy, i;kZIr vk/kkj u ikrs gq,] mldk mUekspu izkFkZuk i= fujLr fd;k gS] ftlesa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh =qfV ifjyf{kr ugha gksrh gS rFkk ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶13

rn~uqlkj ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk fo}ku fo’ks"k U;k;k/kh’k] (,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV)@ vij l= U;k;k/kh’k] xkft;kckn }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 31&1&2018 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA

¶14

vUrfje vkns’k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls lekIr le>k tk;A

¶15

dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA fn0 % 27&07&2021 ds0lh0flag

Lokesh Dhodi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokesh Dhodi v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dheeraj Khare Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Gupta and Another Vs State of U.P.

Kumari Chanda Thru Murari @ Murali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Purushottam Giri Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Harihar Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajnesh Vs State of U.P. and Another