The court observed that the impugned order lacked sufficient reasons to justify being the subject of a second consideration, recommending its recording of reasons.
Directed the authority to record reasons for the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 295 of 2018
Revisionist :- Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Kumar Kaushal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Siya Ram Verma,Akansha Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bhaju Ram Pprasad Sharma,Mool Chandra
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
lwph iqujhf{krA
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA foi{khx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk Jh ewy pUnz ,oa foi{kh la0 1 dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA
lwph iqujhf{kr djk;s tkus ij Hkh bl okn esa fdlh ds mifLFkr u gksus ds dkj.k ;g fuxjkuh vne iSjoh esa fujLr dh tkrh gSA
bl okn esa ;fn dksbZ vUrfje vkns’k gks rks mls fujLr ekuk tk;A
;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn Hkfo"; esa bl okn dks iquLFkkZfir djus gsrq dksbZ vkosnu i= fn;k tkrk gS rks mls bl U;k;ihB ls lac) u ekurs gq, mi;qDr U;k;ihB ds le{k lwphc) fd;k tk,xk D;ksafd bl okn dks xq.k nks"k ds vk/kkj ij ugha fujLr fd;k x;k gSA
dk;kZy; dks funsZ’k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k ls lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks rRdky voxr djk;k tk;A
fn0 % 28&07&2021 ds0lh0flag
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order was recorded with sufficient reasons to fall under Article 134(1) of the Constitution of India.
Whether Article 132(1) of the Constitution of India provides for a second reconsideration of the impugned judgment.
Whether a lower authority is empowered to resolve a question on Article 14(3) of the C.P.C.
Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Kumar Kaushal
State Of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
