The High Court of Calcutta quashed a summons under Section 156(3) CrPC without recording material. The Court finds the order incomplete and remands it.
The impugned order is set aside and the case is remanded to the High Court for reconsideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2440 of 2021
Revisionist :- Vinod Kumar Jatav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Omar Zamin Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh] okn la0 48 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 156 (3) na0iz0la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn esa Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] Q:Z[kklckn }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 9&8&2021 ds fo:) nk;j dh x;h gSA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd /kkjk 156 (3) na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k tks vkosnu i= izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk] mlds lkFk fuxjkuhdrkZ us leLr vko’;d lk{; izLrqr fd, Fks] fdUrq voj U;k;ky; us mUgsa ugha ekuk rFkk ;g dg fn;k fd mDr izi= U;k;ky; esa ugha nkf[ky fd, x,A tcfd mDr izkFkZuk i= ns[kus ls gh ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk lHkh vko’;d lk{; ,oa izi= U;k;ky; esa nkf[ky fd, x, Fks rFkk U;k;ky; }kjk bl vk/kkj ij izkFkZuk i= fujLr dj fn;k x;k fd Fkkus ls vk[;k vkgwr dh x;h] ftlds vuqlkj izkFkZuki= esa of.kZr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij Fkkus esa eqdnek iathd`r gksuk ugha ik;k x;kA bl izdkj fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ dk izkFkZuk i= fujLr djrs le; lk{;ksa dh vuns[kh dh x;h gS] mudk mfpr ewY;kadu ugha fd;k x;k] blfy, iz’uxr vkns’k vikLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks lquus rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dks ns[krs gq,] ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk okn la0 48 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 156 (3) na0iz0la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn esa Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] Q:Z[kklckn }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 9&8&2021 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk izdj.k dks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k bl funsZ’k ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k esa mfYyf[kr fdlh Hkh fVIi.kh ds xq.k&nks"k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj nsrs gq,] mDr okn iqu% fuLrkj.k 2 ekg ds vUnj fd;k tk;A
dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA
fn0 % 22&11&2021 ds0lh0flag
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the summons issued under Section 156(3) CrPC without recording the material on record.
Whether the order dated 09-08-2021 needs to be remanded to the High Court for reconsideration.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vinod Kumar Jatav
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
