Allowed

Himanshu v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Nov 2021CRLR/26/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal revision, the Hon'ble Bench allowed the petitioner's application challenging the trial court's order regarding age determination and trial proceedings, citing principles protecting juvenile rights and flaws in the procedural history concerning the provisional registration and subsequent trial.

What did the court decide?

The order was set aside, the case was remanded for regular disposal ensuring attention to the proceedings under relevant sections.

Himanshu Vs State of U.P. and Another — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 77

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 26 of 2021

¶3

Revisionist :- Himanshu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Rajesh Yadav,Ruchi Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSaA

¶6

bl izdj.k esa vkns’k fn0 10&8&2021 }kjk foi{kh la0 2 dks uksfVl tkjh dh x;h Fkh] fdUrq mldh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA

¶7

fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh fuxjkuh] eq0v0la0 150 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 363] 366] 376 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk fcYgkSj] ftyk dkuiqj uxj ls mn~Hkwr okn esa tqosukby tfLVl cksMZ] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 27&8&2020 rFkk bl vkns’k ds fo:) nk;j nkf.Md vihy la0 29 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV ,.M ls’kUl tt] dksVZ ua0 13@ Lis’ky tt] ikDlks ,sDV] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k fn0 11&11&2020 ds fo:) ;ksftr dh x;h gSA

¶8

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd fuxjkuhdrkZ ?kVuk ds le; ukckfyx Fkk fdUrq lacaf/kr lacaf/kr tqosukby tfLVl cksMZ }kjk vkns’k fn0 27&8&2020 e sa ;g dFku fd;k x;k gS fd vipkjh dh ekufld ,oa 'kkjhfjd {kerk] mlds }kjk dfFkr :i ls dkfjr vijk/k ds ifj.kkeksa dks le>us dh ;ksX;rk rFkk ifjfLFkfr;ka ftuesa dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr fd;k x;k] n’kkZrh gSa fd vipkjh esa ,d o;Ld dh ckSf)d {kerk gS] mldk fopkj.k fd’kksj ds :i esa fd;k tkuk U;k;ksftr ugha gS] mldk fopkj.k o;Ld ds :i esa gh fd;k tkuk pkfg,A fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vfHker O;Dr djrs gq, rFkk fuxjkuhdrkZ dks ukckfyx ?kksf"kr djrs le; mlds gkbZ Ldwy izek.k i= ,oa fu;eksa dh vuns[kh djrs gq, fo}ku voj U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mDr iz’uxr vkns’k fof/k fo:) gSA

¶9

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd mDr vkns’k ds fo:) fuxjkuhdrkZ }kjk nkf.Md vihy la0 29 lu 2020 nk;j dh x;h] tks fd fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk [kkfjt dj nh x;h rFkk fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 27&8&2020 dh iqf"V dh x;h rFkk fo}ku vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk Hkh fuxjkuhdrkZ dks mlds gkbZ Ldwy izek.k i= esa mfYyf[kr tUe frfFk dks utjvankt djrs gq, mls ukckfyx u ?kksf"kr fd;k tkuk dkuwu dk mYya?ku gS rFkk mDr iz’uxr vkns’k fof/k fo:) gSA

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us bldk izfrjks/k fd;kA

¶11

fuxjkuhdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶12

lsD’ku 94 (2) fd’kksj U;k; (ckydksa dh ns[k js[k ,oa laj{k.k) vf/kfu;e 2015 ds vuqlkj ckydksa dh vk;q ds fu/kkZj.k ds fy, ogh nLrkost ekU; gSa tks fd mDr /kkjk 94 (2) esa mfYyf[kr gSaA Ldwy dk tUe izek.k&i= ;k eSfVzd ;k led{k izek.k&i= vxj ;g nLrkost ugha gS rks fuxe ;k uxjikfydk ;k iapk;r ds }kjk tkjh fd;k x;k tUe izek.k&i= vkSj vxj ;g nLrkost Hkh ugha gS rks fpfdRlh; ijh{k.k ds vk/kkj ij vk;q fu/kkZfjr gksrh gSA izLrqr izdj.k esa fuxjkuhdrkZ dk gkbZ Ldwy vad i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa mldh tUe frfFk 30&7&2002 vafdr gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa fd’kksj U;k; cksMZ ds }kjk ikfjr vkyksP; vkns’k dh iqf"V fd;s tkus ;ksX; vkns’k ugha gSA

¶13

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ dks lquus i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ds ns[krs gq,] tqosukby tfLVl cksMZ] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 27&8&2020 rFkk bl vkns’k ds fo:) nk;j nkf.Md vihy la0 29 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV ,.M ls’kUl tt] dksVZ ua0 13@ Lis’ky tt] ikDlks ,sDV] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k fn0 11&11&2020 ljljh rkSj ij =qfViw.kZ gksuk izrhr gksrs gSaA

¶14

rn~uqlkj ;g nkf.Md fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk tqosukby tfLVl cksMZ] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr vkns’k fn0 27&8&2020 rFkk bl vkns’k ds fo:) nk;j nkf.Md vihy la0 29 lu 2020 esa ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV ,.M ls’kUl tt] dksVZ ua0 13@ Lis’ky tt] ikDlks ,sDV] dkuiqj nsgkr }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vkns’k fn0 11&11&2020 vikLr fd, tkrs gSa] ,oa izdj.k dks muds le{k bl funsZ’k ds lkFk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns’k esa mfYyf[kr fdlh Hkh fVIi.kh ds xq.k&nks"k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] i{kdkjksa dks lquokbZ dk leqfpr volj nsrs gq, ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d :is.k voyksdu djus ds mijkUr] izdj.k ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tk;A

¶15

dk;kZy; dks funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd bl vkns'k dh ,d izfrfyfi lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks vfoyEc Hkstuk lqfuf'pr djsA

¶16

vUrfje vkns’k ;fn dksbZ gks rks mls lekIr le>k tk;A

¶17

fn0 % 18&11&2021 ds0lh0flag

¶18

2 of 2

Himanshu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himanshu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Kumar (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Saif Ali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Arvind Yadav (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ankur @ Ankur Maheshwari Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramanuj Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Satya Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Another