A criminal revision was filed by Soni Patel. The revisionist counsel expressed unwillingness to press the revision, and the opposite parties did not object. The revision was dismissed without further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1726 of 2019
Revisionist :- Soni Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Manu Sharma,Dinesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Manu Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not wish to press the revision and that the same may be dismissed.
Sri Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Jhamman Ram, learned AGA appearing for the State opposite party have no objection to the prayer so made.
The revision stands accordingly dismissed .
Order Date :- 8.9.2021 Kirti
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J)
Soni Patel
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
