The High Court dismissed Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 9485 of 2019 for want of prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear. The interim order was vacated.
The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution and the interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9485 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Nafisa Begum And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K.S.Parihar,Birendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Sunil Kumar Kushwaha
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition. Learned Advocate for the respondent no. 4 is present.
The mediation report shows that no settlement could be arrived between the parties.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The interim order stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.9.2021 gp
Nafisa Begum And 4 Others
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
